Greetings, young seeker! Guess what? Something pretty interesting happened in the world recently. So, there were these incidents in Sweden where some people burned the Quran, which is a holy book for Muslims. That’s not nice at all, right?

Well, because of those incidents, some countries got together at the United Nations (UN) to talk about it. They wanted to make a rule saying that burning the Quran is a bad thing and should be condemned. But, you know what? Some countries were worried that this rule might limit freedom of speech. They thought it might stop people from expressing their opinions freely.

Quran Burning Debate

• One country called Pakistan spoke up and asked for an urgent discussion about this issue. They wanted to make sure everyone understood how important it was. And guess what? A group of people called the UN Human Rights Council listened to them and made a rule saying that it’s very mean and bad to burn the Quran on purpose because it makes people feel really sad and disrespected about their religion
• Now, here’s the interesting part. Out of all the countries in the UN Human Rights Council, 28 of them said, “Yeah, we agree! Burning the Quran is wrong!” The countries such as China, Ukraine, and lots of countries in Africa agreed. But, hold on, there were also twelve countries that said, “Nope, we don’t agree.” These countries included France, Germany, the UK, and even the USA!
• The resolution that got approved says that countries should make laws to punish people who burn the Quran on purpose. The UN wants to know which countries don’t have these laws yet, so they can help them figure things out. They even want to gather a group of experts to talk about this issue and find solutions.
• The ambassador from Pakistan, Khalil Hashmi, said the resolution is fair and doesn’t blame any particular country. But some countries, mostly from the Western part of the world, said they didn’t like it. They spoke out against laws that restrict freedom of expression and criticized the burning incidents in Sweden.
• The United States, the European Union, and the United Kingdom, which are all Western countries, told other countries to vote against the resolution. They felt it didn’t support the idea of free speech, which they believe is very important.
• Now, here’s a twist. Some countries from Latin America, like Mexico and Honduras, didn’t say “yes” or “no” to the resolution. They decided to abstain, which means they didn’t vote either way. They wanted more time to discuss and find a common agreement.
• Another country that voted against the resolution was Costa Rica. Before the vote, they said that criticizing religions doesn’t automatically mean you’re promoting violence or discrimination. They thought it’s important to be able to express your opinions, even if they’re critical.
• Oh, and here’s a little extra story for you. In Sweden, on June 28, a person who came from Iraq burned some pages of the Quran in front of a big mosque during a Muslim holiday called Eid al-Adha. The police actually allowed the gathering, but later they started an investigation because they thought it was creating problems between different ethnic groups.
• So, that’s the scoop, my curious friend. The UN Human Rights Council talked about Quran burning, some countries agreed, some didn’t, and it’s all about balancing freedom of expression and respecting different religions. It’s a tricky topic, but important to think about, isn’t it?

Similar Stories